Ultimately, who profits?

So who's going to police the federally regulated commercial medical pot growers?

Editor, The News:

Medical marijuana is not the culprit.

Does anyone with an ounce of  common sense think more legislation (read government cash grab) will do anything to lessen the existence of grow-ops currently operating in Maple Ridge?

The idea of coming down on the poor fellow who has a license to grow 20 plants for personal use is akin to telling someone they can’t smoke in their own backyard.

Making things bigger, more controlled, and downright clunky for the little guy is not going to force your dedicated-to-profiteering, wannabe-gangster into converting his entire operation into a trendy soy bean plantation.

In fact, regulation that will have the cops chasing their tails over granny green thumb’s little herb garden will mean the focus of finding,  shutting down, and busting true, designed-for-profit, grow-ops will be hampered by nit-picking bureaucrats  who want the red serge boys to follow up on every complaint or well-meant tip where there was a skunk-like odor, a suspicious pit-bull, or (God help us) young people congregating.

Which brings me to question period.

Who is going to be ultimately responsible for the federally regulated commercial producers?

Just saying federally regulated three times means hiring at least one more senator and creating jobs for at least two more ministers.

We’ll soon be paying for a new right honorable ‘Minister of Marijuana,’ and the right honorable ‘Minister of New Medical Licenses’ and all the flunkies that do the paperwork on just another top-heavy project.

It is succinctly understood that at least four people have to physically touch a government form before it hits the right inbox, so who tests it for potency or consistency? Who delivers it to the infirm or handicapped? What is a strict security requirement? Does that mean armed guards, black bears (oh wait, they didn’t pan out), or 18-year-olds with rocks in their pockets and a bad attitude. Does that mean a rheumatoid senior or a handicapped kid will get  busted if they don’t comply?

Oh, and who ultimately profits? And how?

Cause I want to sign up.

Randy Wagner

Maple Ridge

Just Posted

Pitt Meadows thinks twice about duplexes

City has 960 lots that could have two-unit housing

Alert issued for South Alouette River

River is flowing high due to a controlled release from the Alouette Dam.

UPDATE: Access restored to West Coast Express station after Mission shooting

Passengers bound for Mission may need to exit the train at Port Haney Station.

Education minister blasts Chilliwack school trustee on gender issues

Fleming calls Neufeld’s behaviour ‘shameful’ and ‘unacceptable’

Ridge paddlers named to provincial team

Malfesi leads group of six athletes from the Whonnock club

Can’t kill bears for eating honey

Maple Ridge, Pitt Meadows farmers encouraged to use electric fencing

Charge laid against B.C. man in cat torture

Joshua Michael Lemire, 20, has been charged with one count of causing unnecessary pain/suffering to an animal.

Oxford Dictionary responds by video to Victoria boy’s bid for levidrome

William Shatner tweet garners attention of Oxford

Site C allows more wind, solar energy, experts say

Lawyer, economist argue for completion of B.C. Hydro dam

Record-high temperatures reached in 18 spots in B.C.

White Rock, Victoria and the Fraser Valley made new records for the unusually warm November day

Supreme Court to hear case on whether ISPs can charge for IDing online pirates

Film producers seeking to crack down on people who share copyrighted material illegally

Snow warning for the Coquihalla

Driving through highway passes will require some extra caution today.

5 to start your day

Coquitlam dog walker rescued, education minister blasts Chilliwack trustee and more

Canadian initiative fuelled by Terry Fox’s dream may be only hope for young cancer patients

Young cancer patients in rural or remote areas did not always get the testing available

Most Read