AirCare customers are simply paying inspection fee

This was supposed to be a 'Family Friendly Government'

Editor, The News:

Re: Why I am paying so much for AirCare? (The News, Nov. 20, 2013)

I’d like take this opportunity to address John Turner’s letter of November 20, 2013 concerning the AirCare test fee.

AirCare is required by the Motor Vehicle Act to set its test fees at a level no greater than what is required to fully recover the costs of delivering the program. The program must therefore be revenue-neutral, incurring neither a loss, nor a profit. Fees collected cannot be used for any other purpose than operating the program, making it a true, user-pay system.

Many motorists mistakenly believe they are paying for coverage similar to Autoplan insurance when they have their AirCare test.  However, the AirCare test fee is designed to pay only for the test itself and not the time between that test and the date when another inspection will be required.

The AirCare expiry date for 1992-and-newer model year vehicles was intended to allow motorists to purchase two, 12-month license and insurance policies from ICBC. All 1992-and-newer vehicles having an inspection in 2013 still receive this value as they could not otherwise renew in 2014 without having had an inspection.

The $23 test fee applies to a different and simpler test that must be performed annually on 1991-an- older model year vehicles.  The roughly two-to-one ratio of the fee for 1992-and-newer vehicles compared to the fee for 1991-and-older vehicles was intentionally chosen to provide approximately the same annual cost to vehicle owners.

Despite perceptions to the contrary, AirCare customers are simply paying a fee for an inspection which assesses a vehicle’s emissions performance at that point in time. As the value for the fee is fully provided with the inspection, there is no unused value to be rebated as a result of the program concluding in December, 2014.

Dave Gourley, P.Eng.

General Manager, AirCare

Just Posted

Gardening: George and the family berry plan

Pitt Meadows family’s farm roots go back to 1925.

Letter: Premier has ‘no clue’ on PR

Or Horgan is deliberately hiding his intentions.

B.C. Legions in need of young members to continue aiding veterans into the future

Lest we forget what thousands of men and women did to fight for Canada’s freedoms – but without new membership, many Legion chapters face dwindling numbers

MacDuff’s Call: I will be voting to stay with First Past the Post

‘This referendum isn’t about good governance.’

Maple Ridge care home celebrates veteran on Nov. 11

Lt.-Col. John Bossons joined the Royal Canadian Air Force in January 1960.

Clear skies for Fraser Blues Remembrance Day flyby

It was the first time the formation team flew over the Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Remembrance Day ceremonies

Touching note left on Lower Mainland veteran’s windshield

A veteran is hoping the writers of a note know how much he was touched by their kind words.

B.C. health care payroll tax approved, takes effect Jan. 1

Employers calculating cost, including property taxes increases

Nunavut urges new plan to deal with too many polar bears

Territory recommends a proposal that contradicts much of conventional scientific thinking

18-year-old to hospital after shots fired in White Rock

Police investigating early-morning incident

Shelter struggles: Landlord takes over rental unit whenever visiting B.C. town

Renter’s story highlights how hard it is to find accommodation in Revelstoke

‘Weird Al’ brings Strings Attached tour to Lower Mainland next summer

Legendary musical satirist performs with full symphony orchestra

Lack of public response threatens B.C. referendum credibility

Of the few who have voted, poll finds most rejected proportional representation

Tentative deal reached in NHL concussion lawsuit

More than 100 former players accused the league of failing to better prevent head trauma

Most Read